ع
The Abu Dhabi Family, Civil and Administrative Court has dismissed a lawsuit in which a young man sought repayment of AED156,000 that he claimed to have lent his friend. Emirates 24|7 reported that the plaintiff filed the case citing bank transfer records as evidence of the alleged loan. The court determined that such transfers by themselves do not establish the existence of a debt or a binding agreement to repay. Judges concluded the claimant failed to meet the required standard of proof under applicable civil law provisions.
Emirates 24|7 reported that the defendant denied the transfers represented a loan, prompting the court to examine whether additional documentation existed. No formal loan agreement, written acknowledgment or other corroborating evidence was presented during proceedings. The ruling emphasised that financial transactions must be accompanied by clear indicators of intent to create a debtor-creditor relationship before a court can order repayment.
The decision aligns with precedents in which Abu Dhabi courts have rejected similar claims when plaintiffs relied solely on bank records, Gulf News data on comparable cases shows. In one instance covered by the same publication, a woman’s claim against her ex-husband for AED55,500 was dismissed because transfers between spouses could not be conclusively deemed loans without further proof. Legal principles applied in these matters place the burden of proof squarely on the party asserting the debt, a standard drawn from the UAE Civil Transactions Law.
Abu Dhabi Judicial Department figures indicate personal loan disputes form a notable portion of civil cases handled annually, with many turning on the quality of supporting evidence. A review of regional court trends by local legal observers notes that undocumented personal lending frequently leads to dismissals when intent cannot be demonstrated. Parties are therefore encouraged to secure signed agreements or electronic admissions to strengthen their positions in potential litigation.
Emirates 24|7 noted the current case concluded without any order for repayment, damages or legal costs against either party. The outcome adds to a series of rulings this year clarifying evidentiary thresholds for debt recovery actions in the capital. Similar cases reported across UAE outlets have reinforced the need for comprehensive documentation in informal financial arrangements between individuals.
